Following an replace from FTX debtors concerning the $5.5 billion found by directors throughout an investigation, former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) took to Twitter to share a weblog submit from his Substack publication. SBF acknowledged that the presentation revealed by litigation agency Sullivan & Cromwell is “extraordinarily deceptive” and that FTX US is solvent and “all the time has been.”

SBF Claims Misrepresentation by Litigation Agency, Twitter Critics Doubt Solvency

Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) is offering further data in response to the current press launch and 20-page presentation doc issued by FTX debtors and present restructuring directors. The press launch reported that investigators discovered $5.5 billion in liquid property. In response, SBF posted a brand new weblog on his Substack publication and acknowledged on Twitter, “FTX US is solvent, because it all the time has been.” The weblog submit echoes this assertion and asserts discrepancies between Sullivan & Cromwell’s (S&C) reporting and SBF’s spreadsheet.

He disputes the assertion in the presentation that FTX US has a “shortfall” and maintains that FTX US will not be bancrupt. “S&C claims that FTX US has a shortfall,” SBF mentioned in his newest weblog submit. “That declare is fake. Primarily based on S&C’s personal knowledge supplied in the identical court docket presentation, FTX US had roughly $609 million of property ($428 million in financial institution accounts, plus $181 million in tokens) backing roughly $199 million in buyer balances. FTX US was solvent when it was turned over to S&C, and nearly actually stays solvent at this time.”

Regardless of SBF’s claims, a number of individuals on social media mocked the FTX co-founder and particularly criticized his Excel spreadsheet. “Bro typed out a few numbers in 5 minutes pondering it’s gonna be his get out of jail free card,” one individual tweeted in response to SBF’s newest weblog submit. “Good Excel sheet {that a} 5-year-old may make — LOL — Means nothing. Any individual shut this dude up eternally,” one other individual wrote. SBF’s claims have been met with skepticism and his declarations didn’t look like convincing to many.

Lacking Funds, Lack of Auto-Liquidation Points, and ‘Questionable FTX US Redemption System’ Stay Unaddressed by Former FTX CEO

Plenty of individuals questioned why SBF didn’t touch upon the $10 billion in lacking funds and as soon as once more, his weblog submit didn’t tackle the accusations made in the presentation. For instance, following SBF’s final weblog submit, Bitmex co-founder Arthur Hayes criticized the FTX co-founder for not addressing the shortage of auto-liquidation related to Alameda Analysis. The newest presentation from FTX debtors claims “Alameda Analysis and a small group of people had the flexibility to take away property from the change.” Moreover, the removing of funds was by no means recorded on the corporate’s ledger, and the funds allegedly derived from FTX change clients.

SBF didn’t tackle that particular topic in any respect. It’s absent from his argument towards Sullivan & Cromwell’s presentation. Folks on Twitter introduced this as much as SBF on different Twitter threads concerning the topic, as SBF’s tweets are set to “personal” mode and can’t be commented on. “This doesn’t clarify the allegations of embezzlement to which your colleagues have pleaded responsible,” one individual on Twitter tweeted in response to SBF’s newest claims. One individual instructed the media that SBF’s claims look like intentional “misdirection” and “doubtlessly for authorized/protection functions.”

It’s protected to say that Bankman-Fried’s claims and up to date weblog posts usually are not being taken significantly, and his Excel spreadsheet methodology will not be convincing most people. Some individuals puzzled if SBF was “presumably tweeting towards the recommendation of authorized counsel.” The newest weblog submit was not a lot totally different from the final submit SBF wrote, as they each fail to elucidate quite a few points raised by Bankman-Fried’s co-workers — former Alameda CEO Caroline Ellison and FTX co-founder Gary Wang. Moreover, proof has emerged about how “merchants might have used a questionable FTX US redemption system” for Solana-bridged property.

Conor Rogan, a director at Coinbase who often tweets about onchain actions, mentioned this redemption scheme may complicate the chapter course of. “From November ninth till withdrawals have been halted a number of days later, merchants might have used a questionable FTX US redemption system to funnel [tens of millions] out of the change,” Rogan mentioned. “This might complicate chapter proceedings and additional name into query FTX-FTXUS separation claims,” he added. Rogan mentioned an artificial Solana-based bitcoin (BTC) token referred to as “sollet (soBTC)” which broke its peg when FTX’s troubles have been engulfed in flames. Regardless of the monetary points, FTX US nonetheless processed sollet redemptions on a 1:1 foundation.

The redemptions nonetheless occurred whereas sollet was buying and selling for a lot decrease than BTC’s spot worth, and Rogan believes the “poisonous redemptions” or “swapping unbacked ETH and BTC” led to the potential lack of over $40 million. “FTX US would presumably have 1,700 actual BTC, as a substitute of 1,700 soBTC value near-zero on the open market at this time,” Rogan tweeted. The onchain researcher famous, nonetheless, that the proof was his personal “speculative findings primarily based on analysis into FTX US’s Solana tackle and discussions with members of the Solana group.” Notably, following Rogan’s Twitter thread, SBF determined to answer to the claims made.

“I’m pretty assured that FTX US’s extra money available is far bigger than the dimensions of the wrapped asset problem to the extent there’s one,” SBF wrote in reply to Rogan’s Twitter statements.

As soon as once more, SBF’s remark concerning the sollet (soBTC) problem was met with skepticism and criticism shortly after he revealed the tweet. “You simply mentioned they have been solvent. Now you’re ‘pretty assured?’” one individual requested the FTX co-founder. “I’m pretty assured you’ll spend a very long time in federal jail,” one other particular person tweeted. Rogan’s Twitter thread and SBF’s response additional spotlight that folks don’t appear to be accepting the previous FTX CEO’s statements. “No person believes something you say and so they by no means will,” one individual replied to SBF’s sollet commentary on Twitter.

What are your ideas on Sam Bankman-Fried’s claims of FTX US’ solvency and the accusations of embezzlement and lacking funds? Go away your feedback under.

Earlier article

CoinEx 2022 12 months in Evaluate: New Slogan, Higher Product, and Extra Person-Pleasant Providers

Extra Standard Information

In Case You Missed It

Oman to Incorporate Actual Property Tokenization in Digital Property Regulatory Framework

Actual property tokenization is about to be included into Oman Capital Markets Authority (OCMA)’s digital asset regulatory framework. In line with an advisor with the authority, the tokenizing of actual property will open funding alternatives for native and overseas traders. Actual … learn extra.

Draft Regulation Regulating Features of Crypto Taxation Submitted to Russian Parliament

Privateness-Centric Monero Plans for July Arduous Fork, Plans Embody Ring Signature, Bulletproof Improve

Australia to Listing Bitcoin ETF After four Clearinghouse Contributors Decide to Meet Stringent Margin Phrases

Ethereum Basis’s Monetary Report Discloses It Holds $1.6 Billion in Property, 80.5% Held in Ether